Blackstone River Monitoring and Modeling 

The District is funding monitoring and modeling of the Blackstone River by the University of Massachusetts and CDM, Inc.  General results of our monitoring and modeling efforts through spring, 2011 are discussed in our Project Summary.  The study shows that:

·       With the recent facility upgrades the nutrient load leaving UBWPAD is significantly lower than it was in the past, and improvements in River water quality are expected.

·       The rate of river flow is an important factor influencing algal growth.  Increased algal growth tends to occur in stagnant or low flowing stretches of the river, frequently located behind old industrial era dams, because the algae have more time to consume the nutrients in the water.

·       Because of this, the limits included in the 2008 permit will not achieve the water quality targets for algal growth.

·       In fact, even complete elimination of nutrients in the UBWPAD discharge will not achieve the targets for algal growth or nutrients in all reaches of the river.

·       Our efforts show that water quality targets can only be achieved if all the stagnant river stretches are eliminated.

·       These findings strongly indicate that management of the stagnant river stretches, located primarily behind impoundments, needs to be considered as part of the solution to improving river quality, and that such practices will achieve water quality goals without the need for further plant improvements.

 

If you are interested in more details on the model, the information is contained in the following reports and appendices.  Note that these are lengthy reports and will take some time to download, their size is shown in the list below.

 

Blackstone River Model Reports and Appendices:

 

·       Calibration Report, Aug, 2008                                               33.7 MB

o   Calibration Report Addendum,  Oct., 2011              0.6 MB

 

·       Validation Report, Oct, 2011                                                 1.7 MB

o   Validation Report Appendices A-C                           19.5 MB

o   Validation Report Appendices  D-F                           0.9 MB

o   Validation Report Appendix G                                  43.3 MB

o   Validation Report Appendices  H-N                          29.8 MB